Comparing the accuracy and neuroanatomical correlates of the UPSIT-40 and the Sniffin' Sticks test in REM sleep behavior disorder.
Clicks: 316
ID: 38740
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
66.6
/100
316 views
221 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #5 of 10 articles by views in parkinsonism & related disorders
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Olfactory impairment increases the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases in patients with idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (IRBD). Knowing the test properties of distinct olfactory measures could contribute to their selection for clinical or research purposes.To compare the accuracy in distinguishing IRBD patients from controls with the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT-40) and Sniffin' Sticks Extended test, and to assess the gray-matter volume correlates of these tests.Twenty-one patients with IRBD and 27 healthy controls were assessed using both olfactory tests. Independent logistic regressions were computed with diagnosis as a dependent variable and olfactory measures as predictive variables. Receiver operating characteristic curves were computed for each olfactory subtest. Diagnostic accuracy for IRBD was calculated according to the resulting optimal cut-off score. Structural MRI data, acquired with a 3T scanner, were analyzed with voxel-based morphometry.Patients differed from controls in all olfactory measures. The Sniffin-Identification correctly classified 89.1% of cases; the UPSIT-40, 85.4%; the Sniffin-Discrimination, 82.6%; the Sniffin-Total, 81.8%; and the Sniffin-Threshold, 77.3%. Respective AUROC, optimal cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity for each test were: 0.902, ≤26, 85.7%, and 85.2% for the UPSIT-40; 0.884, ≤29, 89.5%, and 76.0% for the Sniffin-Total; 0.922, ≤11, 90.5%, and 88.0% for the Sniffin-Identification; 0.739, ≤4, 73.7%, and 76.0% for the Sniffin-Threshold; and 0.838, ≤11, 85.7%, and 76.0% for the Sniffin-Discrimination. UPSIT-40 scores correlated with gray-matter volumes in orbitofrontal regions in anosmic patients.UPSIT-40 and Sniffin' Identification showed similar discrimination accuracy, but only the UPSIT-40 showed structural correlates (p ≤ .05 FDR-corrected).
| Reference Key |
campabadal2019comparingparkinsonism
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Campabadal, A;Segura, B;Junque, C;Serradell, M;Abos, A;Uribe, C;Baggio, H C;Gaig, C;Santamaria, J;Bargallo, N;Iranzo, A; |
| Journal | parkinsonism & related disorders |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S1353-8020(19)30276-7
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.