Sugar Consumption Tax: A Good Idea or Not?
Clicks: 190
ID: 38411
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
64.1
/100
185 views
149 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Introduction of a sugar tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has been proposed by peak health bodies and Australian politicians as a strategy to control behaviour that leads to obesity. The question is: what are the implications of imposing a sugar consumption tax on SSBs with the aim to curb the harmful effects of obesity? Arguments for and against a sugar consumption tax pose an ethical dilemma. While evidence supports the implementation of a sugar consumption tax as effective in curbing SSB consumption within certain populations, ethical considerations support the premise that autonomy trumps justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Legal implications include the consideration of Commonwealth and State jurisdiction, discrimination against a person's disability, such as obesity, and infringement on consumer rights. Alternative strategies should be considered to address obesity, including social action, education and information, and use of the media.
| Reference Key |
truscott2019sugarjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Truscott, Jane; |
| Journal | journal of law and medicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | URL not found |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.