Priority setting in Swedish health care: are the politicians ready?
Clicks: 212
ID: 36107
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
61.4
/100
209 views
170 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Resource allocation in public health care principally involves politicians, administrators, and physicians. They all have their different roles, agendas and ambitions when it comes to how public health care resources should be spent. Previous studies on attitudes among health-care stakeholders have mainly focused on views and preferences among clinical decision-makers, while less attention has been paid to the views of health care politicians.The study aimed to investigate if the health care politicians' views on priority setting and decision-making in health care differed from other stakeholder groups.The study was based on a questionnaire conducted among health care politicians, administrators, and physicians in four county councils in Southern Sweden.The findings show significant differences between the politicians and the other two groups in their views on health-care resources, financing, priority setting and decision-making.The findings could, at least partly, be explained by the special situation it means for the politicians to be forced to be re-elected every fourth year to stay in power.
| Reference Key |
rosn2014priorityscandinavian
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Rosén, Per;De Fine Licht, Jenny;Ohlsson, Henrik; |
| Journal | scandinavian journal of public health |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.1177/1403494813520355
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.