Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.

Clicks: 266
ID: 35841
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #21 of 41 articles by views in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The purpose of the work presented here was to establish an experimental testing configuration that would generate a bending compression fracture in a laboratory setting. To this end, we designed and fabricated a fixture to accommodate a three level spine segment and to be able to perform mechanical testing by applying an off-centric compressive loading to create a flexion-type motion. Forces and moments occurring during testing were measured with a six-channel load cell. The initial testing configuration (Fixture A) included plates connected to the superior potted vertebral body and to the ball-socket joint of the testing system ram. Surprisingly, while all cadaveric specimens underwent a similar off-centric compressive loading, most of the specimens showed extension outcomes as opposed to the intended pure-flexion motion. The extension was due to fixture size and weight; by applying an off-centric load directly on the top plate, unintended large shear forces were generated. To resolve the issue, several modifications were made to the original fixture configuration. These modifications included the removal of the superior plates and the implementation of wedges at the superior surface of the fixture (Fixture B). A synthetic sample was used during this modification phase to minimize the number of cadaveric specimens while optimizing the process. The best outcomes were consistently observed when a 15°-wedge was used to provide flexion-type loading. Cadaveric specimens were then experimentally tested to fracture using the modified testing configuration (Fixture B). A comparison between both fixtures, A and B, revealed that almost all biomechanical parameters, including force, moment, and displacement data, were affected by the testing setup. These results suggest that fixture design and implementation for testing is of extreme importance, and can influence the fracture properties and affect the intended motion.
Reference Key
rezaei2019mechanicaljournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Rezaei, Asghar;Giambini, Hugo;Carlson, Kent D;Xu, Hao;Uthamaraj, Susheil;Dragomir-Daescu, Dan;Yaszemski, Michael J;Lu, Lichun;
Journal Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
Year 2019
DOI
S1751-6161(19)30539-9
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.