Ingestion of polyethylene microbeads affects the growth and reproduction of medaka, Oryzias latipes.

Clicks: 217
ID: 34605
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #131 of 145 articles by views in Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 145 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Research using various species of wild and cultured fish has identified negative effects of short-term exposure to microbeads. Although wild animals might be contaminated with microbeads and/or other pharmaceuticals, data regarding the long-term effects remain limited. To clearly elucidate the effects of microbeads, studies of long-term exposure using animal models are necessary. Our aim was to elucidate the effects of microbeads alone on the growth and fecundity of medaka following long-term exposure (12 weeks). In experiment 1, fish groups (except controls) were temporarily exposed to polyethylene microbeads (10-63 μm diameter) a low dose of 0.065 microbeads-mg/L and high dose of 0.65 microbeads-mg/L. In experiment 2, see-through medaka and fluorescent polyethylene microbeads (10-45 μm diameter) were used to estimate the retention time of ingested microbeads in the digestive tract, which was 4-9 days. The low dose of microbeads did not affect growth but did decrease the number of eggs and the hatching rate. The high dose decreased growth, the number of eggs, and hatching rate. Growth differences were recognized for the first time at 7 weeks, and differences in the number of eggs at 12 weeks. Thus, long-term tests using medaka indicated that microbeads per se exhibit growth inhibition and reproductive toxicity. These effects could be associated with nutritional factors resulting from the long retention time of microbeads in the digestive tract. We also determined the dose that affects only fecundity. This suggests that normal growth of medaka in the wild does not mean the environment is free from microbead contamination. We are thus attempting to identify new biological indexes for monitoring the status of microbead contamination using our system.
Reference Key
chisada2019ingestionenvironmental Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Chisada, Shinichi;Yoshida, Masao;Karita, Kanae;
Journal Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
Year 2019
DOI
S0269-7491(19)33102-1
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.