Agreement between current status and retrospective data for prevalence and duration of exclusive breast feeding from low- and middle-income countries surveys.
Clicks: 373
ID: 34422
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
80.9
/100
373 views
278 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #8 of 11 articles by views in paediatric and perinatal epidemiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Indicators to assess exclusive breast feeding (EBF) status are based on current status data according to World Health Organization (WHO), specially to avoid recall bias or imprecise reporting.To analyse the agreement between current status and retrospective data for prevalence and duration of EBF in low- and middle-income countries.Cross-sectional study using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) datasets of infants under six months from 10 low- and middle-income countries. It was applied two kinds of data about EBF: (1) current status data: variables about breast milk and foods offered in the previous day (yes or no) and (2) retrospective data: variables about age at which foods were offered the first time. The prevalence of EBF was estimated the same way for current status and for retrospective data. The median duration for current status data was calculated according to WHO recommendation, and retrospective data were calculated using survival analysis. The Kappa coefficient was applied to assess the agreement of prevalence using both kinds of data.Prevalence of EBF was higher using current status data and differences between both data ranged from 0.5 to 6.4 percentage points. Kappa coefficient ranged from 0.74 (substantial) to 0.94 (almost perfect) in nine countries. Medians were higher using retrospective than current status data for two countries and lower for another two; however, differences were small (from 0.08 to 0.44 month). For six countries, breast-feeding practice was so low that it was not possible to calculate the median using either data.The difference between prevalence and median estimated using current status and retrospective data is little and the agreement ranged to substantial and almost perfect. We suggest the use of retrospective data to estimate duration of EBF in cross-sectional surveys.
| Reference Key |
rinaldi2019agreementpaediatric
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Rinaldi, Ana Elisa Madalena;Azeredo, Catarina Machado;Pereira, Leandro Alves;Horta, Bernardo Lessa;Conde, Wolney Lisboa; |
| Journal | paediatric and perinatal epidemiology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/ppe.12581
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.