Estimating Marginal Effects on Survival Outcomes for Clinical Interpretations and Decision Making

Clicks: 2
ID: 338659
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #378 of 383 articles by views in american journal of epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 383 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The Cox regression model is the most widely used method in survival analysis, but the hazard ratio has limited clinical interpretability. Survival or cumulative incidence curves are often used to illustrate treatment effects, yet there is no consensus on the most appropriate methods for generating these curves, particularly in the presence of confounding and competing risks. We reviewed original research articles published in a general medical journal in 2025, identified limitations in common practices, and describe a marginal effects framework to generate adjusted cumulative incidence curves that are coherent with the analysis model, anchored in absolute risk estimates, and adaptable to competing risks and clustered data. The framework targets the population-average difference in cumulative incidence between exposure groups, under the assumptions of no unmeasured confounding, positivity, and non-informative censoring. As a demonstration, we applied the framework to real-world data from Yek et al. (2025) and showed that it produced clinically interpretable estimates of hospital-acquired antimicrobial resistance risk that a single hazard ratio could not convey. To facilitate implementation, we describe each analytic step in detail, discuss available software, and share an R program with core routines written in C for computational efficiency.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225244793 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal american journal of epidemiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aje/kwag283
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.