Workplace authority in China: gender, parenthood, and work sectors

Clicks: 2
ID: 338368
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #167 of 167 articles by views in social forces

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 167 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Workplace authority is a key individual and organizational resource to which women typically have more limited access than men. Yet, less is known about how parenthood shapes this gender disparity and how the relationship varies across employment regimes. Drawing on nationally representative, longitudinal data from the China Family Panel Studies (2010–2022), I examine within-person changes in women’s and men’s access to supervisory authority following parenthood, with particular attention to variation across the state and private sectors. Fixed-effects results show that, overall, women’s likelihood of holding authority declines after becoming mothers, especially after having two or more children, whereas men experience little change. These dynamics differ by work sector. A considerable motherhood penalty is concentrated in the private sector, whereas a fatherhood premium emerges only in the state sector. Parenthood therefore widens the gender gap in authority in both sectors through distinct patterns. These findings suggest that employment regimes condition the gendered meanings of parenthood and how they translate into access to authority. In China, the state sector’s formal protections may buffer motherhood-related disadvantages, whereas its male-dominated hierarchy and pronatalist agendas may sustain fatherhood-related rewards.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225205558 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal social forces
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/sf/soag157
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.