Against the expressivist interpretation of Nietzsche’s lightning-flash analogy

Clicks: 2
ID: 338341
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #39 of 39 articles by views in The Philosophical Quarterly

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This article argues that Nietzsche’s rejection of the doer/deed distinction in the famous lightning-flash passage in On the Genealogy of Morality 1:13 is more radical than Robert Pippin’s influential expressivist interpretation allows. Nietzsche’s target is not merely the causal conception of agency, but a metaphysical picture according to which a bearer of a capacity subsequently actualizes it in action, and thus ultimately the ontological distinction between potentiality and actuality itself. The conventional distinction between strength and expression presupposes a bearer of a capacity that can remain unactualized; Nietzsche’s criticism of precisely this distinction, together with his identification of force with activity and his rejection of the capacity-bearing ‘substratum’, is also directed against the metaphysical structure required by the potentiality/actuality distinction itself.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225170016 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal The Philosophical Quarterly
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/pq/pqag079
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.