Long-term effect of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in severe asthma.

Klicks: 409
ID: 33821
2019
Artikelqualität & Leistungskennzahlen
Gesamtqualität
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
KI-Qualitätsbewertung
Nicht analysiert
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 14 articles by views in Respiratory medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has demonstrated its effectiveness amongst patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but has never been investigated in severe asthma.In a retrospective study, we included 28 patients with severe asthma (61.5 ± 16.2 years, FEV1: 51.4 ± 17.3%) and 164 matched COPD patients (64.3 ± 11.6 years, FEV1: 47.7 ± 15.5%) who had completed a home-based PR program and pursued at least 12 months of follow-up. The number of steps performed during a 6-min stepper test (6MST), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scores, and the Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire score (VSRQ) were compared between baseline, the post-PR period (post-PR) and after 12 months of follow-up (M12) within each group. The evolution of the 6MST, HAD and VSRQ values between baseline, post-PR and M12 was compared between severe asthma and COPD patients.In the severe asthma group, the 6MST was higher post-PR (504 ± 150, p = 0.043) and at M12 (538 ± 163, p = 0.016) compared with baseline (450 ± 148). The VSRQ score was higher at M12 (39.0 ± 18.6, p = 0.049) but not post-PR (38.7 ± 15.8, p = 0.119) in comparison with baseline (32.2 ± 12.4). There was no difference in the HAD scores between baseline, post-PR and M12. PR outcome was not significantly different between severe asthma and COPD patients at short and long term (p > 0.05).In severe asthma, home-based PR is associated with improved exercise tolerance and quality of life on a long-term basis but does not modify anxiety and depression.
Referenzschlüssel
grosbois2019longtermrespiratory Verwenden Sie diesen Schlüssel zum automatischen Zitieren im Manuskript bei Verwendung von SciMatic Manuscript Manager oder Thesis Manager
Autoren Grosbois, Jean-Marie;Coquart, Jeremy;Fry, Stephanie;Le Rouzic, Olivier;Grosbois, Thomas;Wallaert, Benoit;Chenivesse, Cecile;
Zeitschrift Respiratory medicine
Jahr 2019
DOI
S0954-6111(19)30279-3
URL
Schlüsselwörter Schlüsselwörter nicht gefunden

Zitationen

Keine Zitationen gefunden. Um eine Zitation hinzuzufügen, kontaktieren Sie den Administrator unter info@scimatic.org

Noch keine Kommentare. Seien Sie der Erste, der diesen Artikel kommentiert.