Oversplitting and Bayesian Inference

Clicks: 1
ID: 338157
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #8 of 8 articles by views in The Monist

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract In this paper I will offer a detailed analysis of Bayesian species delimitation methods and the oversplitting problem. I will argue that when discussing oversplitting, two issues should be kept separate: the inference problem concerning the discovery of population structure and the labelling problem surrounding the classification of different lineages as distinct species. Understanding oversplitting as a methodological problem of Bayesian inference is the consequence of not separating the inferential problem from the labelling problem. While there is no intrinsic flaw with Bayesian inference of population structure revealed by oversplitting, treatments of the inference problem can benefit from some of the lessons learned in earlier discussions of Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225128776 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal The Monist
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/monist/onag031
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.