The pedagogy of the Whirling Dervishes: forming and unforming the self

Clicks: 2
ID: 338103
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #16 of 16 articles by views in journal of philosophy of education

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Education is almost always imagined as a process of forming, strengthening, or expanding the self. But what if education could also de-form, rather than only form, the self? This article explores that unsettling possibility through the Sufi ritual of the Whirling Dervishes, asking whether the dissolution of the self can be understood and even guided as a pedagogical event. Drawing on concepts such as didactic transposition and pedagogical reduction, it considers how intensely personal spiritual experiences, like self-transcendence and union with the Divine, can be given shape within structured, repeatable practices. Whirling becomes the focal case: a ritual that translates mystical aspiration into physical, sensory movement. The mentor–disciple (murshid–murid) relationship anchors this pedagogy, not through direct instruction but through presence and rhythm, creating the conditions in which the ego can loosen and re-form. The article argues that while self-dissolution resists neat definition—and may seem impossible to teach—it can unfold pedagogically: not through explanation, but through form, repetition, and shared commitment. In doing so, it challenges assumptions about what education is for and invites a broader question for philosophy of education: how far pedagogy’s frame can stretch and what might come into view once we reconsider what pedagogy is really for?
Reference Key
openalex_W7221200988 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal journal of philosophy of education
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jopedu/qhag060
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.