Body Mass Index-Specific Central Adiposity and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes Among Aging Women

Clicks: 6
ID: 338006
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #441 of 448 articles by views in the journal of clinical endocrinology & metabolism

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 448 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
CONTEXT: Body mass index (BMI) does not capture central adiposity, which may provide additional information for type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate BMI-specific waist circumference (WC) categories in relation to incident T2D and assess their performance across independent cohorts. METHODS: Prospective analyses included 133,620 Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participants free of T2D at baseline, randomly assigned to training (70%; n=93,463) and test (30%; n=40,157) samples. External validation included the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; n=2,885) and Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span (HANDLS; n=1,037). Cox models estimated T2D risk across BMI and BMI-specific WC categories. Discrimination was assessed using Harrell's C-statistic. RESULTS: In WHI, T2D risk increased progressively across BMI categories (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs], 1.51-3.30) and joint BMI-WC categories (HRs, 1.40-4.43). Within BMI strata, higher WC generally identified greater T2D risk. Associations were directionally consistent in HRS and HANDLS. Age modified associations, with stronger gradients at younger ages, whereas race and ethnicity interactions were not statistically significant. Model discrimination was modest (C-statistics approximately 0.60-0.75). CONCLUSIONS: BMI-specific WC categories refine adiposity-related T2D risk stratification beyond BMI alone but provide modest individual-level discrimination. WC may complement BMI in identifying women warranting more comprehensive metabolic risk assessment rather than serving as a stand-alone T2D prediction tool.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225019900 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal the journal of clinical endocrinology & metabolism
Year 2026
DOI
10.1210/clinem/dgag443
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.