Motion-Robust Dental MRI for Imaging of Paediatric Dental Trauma

Clicks: 1
ID: 337959
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #55 of 55 articles by views in dentomaxillofacial radiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Dental MRI provides soft-tissue contrast without ionising-radiation, but is susceptible to motion, particularly in paediatric imaging. Independent mandibular motion limits conventional single-rigid-model correction, while tailored strategies remain unexplored for dental MRI. We developed an automated, region-adaptive motion-corrected reconstruction method tailored to dental MRI. METHODS: The proposed method automatically defines the maxillary- and mandibular landmarks, performs region-specific joint motion-corrected reconstruction, and fuses the motion-corrected regions into a single motion-free image. The method has broadly sequence applicability without using external motion-free reference, navigator, or prospective tracking. It was validated with three multi-contrast 3D sequences at 0.55T in adult controlled-motion experiments and paediatric scans. Image quality was assessed using normalised gradient square (NGS) and blinded radiologist scoring. Uncorrected (No-MoCo), full field-of-view single-rigid-model correction (MoCo-fullFOV), and fused region-adaptive correction (MoCo-fused) were compared. Cross-correlation between maxillary and mandibular motion traces classified shared and independent mandibular motion pattern. RESULTS: Eight healthy adults and 11 paediatric patients, including 10 with traumatic dental injuries and one with delayed dental development, completed 42 acquisitions. Across all acquisitions, MoCo-fused improved NGS compared with No-MoCo (P<.0001) and MoCo-fullFOV (P=.0004). In mandibular-involved motion cases (n = 23), MoCo-fullFOV did not significantly improve image quality, whereas MoCo-fused improved both NGS and radiologist scores compared with No-MoCo. Lower cross-correlation between maxillary and mandibular motion traces was associated with greater NGS improvement for MoCo-fused over MoCo-fullFOV (Spearman r = -0.66, P<.0001). Paediatric examples showed improved visualisation of pulp signal and inflammatory change after motion correction. The method is open-sourced at https://github.com/ZihanNing/dental_MRI_motion_correction.git. CONCLUSIONS: Automated region-adaptive motion-corrected dental MRI improved image quality, particularly with mandibular motion.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224963915 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zihan Ning, Rubens Spin‐Neto, Jonathan Davies, Saoirse O’Toole, Kathleen Colford, Sarah McElroy, Alena Uus, Sara Neves Silva, Owen Addison, Jo V Hajnal
Journal dentomaxillofacial radiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dmfr/twag073
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.