Design and shielding effectiveness of adjustable modular medical radiation shelter

Clicks: 4
ID: 337947
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #53 of 54 articles by views in Radiation protection dosimetry

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Medical imaging and radiotherapy rely on ionizing radiation that must be contained to protect staff, patients, and the public. Conventional shielding rooms use permanent, immobile concrete walls that are slow to build, leaving primary clinics and emergency sites poorly served. A modular, adjustable shelter was designed with six-sided composite walls combining barite-paraffin, a 24-cm water layer, and 0.5-20-mm lead plates for synergistic photon and neutron shielding, with S/Z-shaped penetrations to suppress joint leakage. Per the Chinese diagnostic radiology standard GBZ 130-2020, analytical models predicted shielding of 70-150 kVp diagnostic X-rays and 6 MV photons and an 11.9-fold reduction of 2 MeV neutrons. Geant4 Monte Carlo validation across six clinical scenarios (39 keV-1.47 MeV photons, 2 MeV neutrons) reproduced the model within 2.5% at 511 keV; exterior ambient dose equivalent H*(10) remained below 0.5 μSv h-1, satisfying the GBZ 130-2020 public dose limit. The shelter provides flexible, rapidly deployable protection for routine and emergency medical use.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224923256 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Radiation protection dosimetry
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncag128
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.