When X-ray Features Fail to Identify Intrinsic Emitters: Label Noise and Luminosity Overlap in Machine Learning Classification of AGN and Star-forming Galaxies

Clicks: 3
ID: 337889
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #50 of 51 articles by views in RAS Techniques and Instruments

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Previously, we found that adding an X-ray flux feature to a Random Forest classifier of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and star-forming galaxies (SFGs) coincided with a decrease in classification accuracy from 97.51% to 89.26%, a counterintuitive result given the prevailing theory that X-rays are a reliable AGN diagnostic. We investigate this discrepancy through both astrophysical and machine learning lenses. On the astrophysical side, we show that the X-ray luminosities of AGN and SFGs in the sample substantially overlap across the canonical 1042 erg/s threshold, reflecting the moderate luminosity characteristic of an optically-selected sample and the contribution of high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) to SFG emission. On the machine learning side, we argue that BPT-derived training labels carry instance-dependent label noise concentrated near the BPT demarcation line, where X-ray data would be most useful as a discriminator. We show that objects misclassified in 5-fold cross-validation cluster near the Kewley demarcation curve, with a median distance of 0.123 dex versus 0.743 dex for correctly classified objects (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D = 0.745, p = 1.67 × 10−9). A controlled cross-validation decomposition shows that the previously reported decrease reflects predominantly sample selection: on a fixed sample, adding the X-ray feature leaves class-resolved metrics unchanged, and its permutation importance is consistent with zero across resampled splits. The classifier therefore makes negligible use of a physically informative feature, consistent with training labels coupled to the optical features. We conclude that future classifiers operating on optically-selected samples should employ independent label sources or noise-robust training methods.
Reference Key
openalex_W7168456102 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jaymin Ding
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal RAS Techniques and Instruments
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rasti/rzag091
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzag091
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.