Evaluation of occupational radiation exposure and safety practices among orthopedic surgeons using C-arm fluoroscopy: a preliminary study at a hospital in Palestine

Clicks: 4
ID: 337862
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #54 of 54 articles by views in Radiation protection dosimetry

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This study presents, to our knowledge, the first dosimetric evaluation of occupational radiation exposure among orthopedic teams using C-arm fluoroscopy in Palestine. Thermoluminescence dosemeters (LiF:Mg,Ti, TLD-100) measured $H_{p}(10)$ and $H_{p}(0.07)$ at five anatomical sites on one surgeon during six procedures over 32 days: unshielded upper arms and shielded thyroid, chest, and gonads. The highest measured personal dose equivalent, $H_{p}(10)$, was 0.21 mSv at the unshielded right upper arm (30-day normalized value: 0.19 mSv; 11.7% of the monthly reference value derived from the International Commission on Radiological Protection annual occupational effective-dose limit). Although shielding reduced torso exposure, safety compliance was poor: 37% of staff consistently used lead aprons, 22.2% used thyroid shields, and 13.3% used dosemeters. These findings identify systemic gaps requiring enforced protection measures, routine monitoring, and staff education.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225007047 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Radiation protection dosimetry
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncag130
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.