Community structure of the pseudofractal web

Clicks: 6
ID: 337756
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #2 of 3 articles by views in Journal of Complex Networks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The Ramsey community number $ r_{\kappa} $ is the smallest network size at which a graph is better described by a partition into communities than by no partition, under a prescribed detection rule and at certainty $ q $. On a scale-free graph this question is confounded: a block model can split a network on its degree distribution alone, separating hubs from leaves that are no community at all. I compute $ r_{\kappa} $ analytically for the deterministic pseudofractal scale-free web of Dorogovtsev, Goltsev, and Mendes, separating genuine community structure from degree heterogeneity with two closed-form detection rules. Under a plain Bernoulli stochastic block model, the web’s natural recursive bipartition is unpreferred while small and breaks at $ \boldsymbol{r_{\kappa} = 1095} $ nodes, with a log-evidence growing as $ \boldsymbol{(\ln 3-\tfrac{2}{3}\ln 2)n} $. Under a degree-corrected model tested against the configuration-model null, the same partition survives, breaking far earlier at $ \boldsymbol{r_{\kappa} = 123} $, with a log-evidence growing as $ \boldsymbol{(2\ln 3-\tfrac{4}{3}\ln 2)n} $—exactly twice the plain slope, and independent of the prior. Both figures are quoted at the default certainty $ \boldsymbol{q = 0.99} $; the transitions are sharp and the web exists only at discrete sizes, so of the values tabulated only $ \boldsymbol{q=\tfrac{1}{2}} $ changes an answer, lowering the degree-corrected one to 42. Degree correction reverses the ordering of the candidate cuts, demoting the hub–leaf split and elevating the recursive one. Because the web is self-similar, the best description is not two communities but a nested hierarchy: the degree-corrected evidence keeps rising as the partition is refined, and is maximized at of order $ \sqrt{n} $ communities of $ \boldsymbol{\sim\sqrt{n}} $ nodes. A purely local recursive rule thus builds true hierarchical community structure, over and above the scale-free degree sequence it also produces, in an exactly solvable setting. The appendices give every derivation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167628123 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of Complex Networks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/comnet/cnag040
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.