Who cares for older persons in South Africa? A socio-political analysis of family caregiving of older persons

Clicks: 6
ID: 337706
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #6 of 9 articles by views in Journal of global ageing.

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This article examines who provides care to older persons in South Africa and with what consequences. In contexts where public provision for long-term care remains limited, families are widely positioned as the primary providers of support. Drawing on an in-depth qualitative study conducted in seven communities across three South African provinces, the article analyses interviews with caregivers from caregiving dyads comprising older persons receiving care (n = 96) and their primary caregivers (n = 103). The findings show that family caregiving is not the outcome of free choice or cultural preference but is produced through structural conditions that constrain who is available to care and under what circumstances. Care is organised across distance through migration and relocation; accumulates over time through the legacies of HIV/AIDS, mortality and unemployment; is physically embodied in caregiving by individuals who are themselves ageing, unwell or exhausted; and is economically consequential, frequently requiring caregivers, most often women, to withdraw from paid employment and forego future opportunities. These dynamics are conceptualised as a form of familialism by default, in which responsibility for care is implicitly shifted onto families in the absence of adequate public provision. By making visible the everyday arrangements, negotiations and costs of family caregiving, the findings underscore the limits of policy regimes that assume the availability of family care without support and point to the need for sustained investment in community-based and long-term care systems that recognise and support caregivers.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224437010 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of global ageing.
Year 2026
DOI
10.1332/29767202y2026d000000056
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.