People, places, and firms: improving our understanding of wage and productivity disparities

Clicks: 7
ID: 337665
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #30 of 33 articles by views in journal of economic geography

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract In many countries spatial disparities in wages and productivity are large and persistent. This raises questions about the causes and consequences of such disparities. Two inter-related issues—the sorting of high skilled workers and the productivity benefits of urban density—are central to the way in which urban economists have approached these questions. In this commentary, we argue that despite the emerging consensus that sorting matters for wage disparities, the literature has made less progress on other dimensions of these disparities and a number of methodological issues remain unresolved.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223418516 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal journal of economic geography
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jeg/lbag078
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.