Sick of change? Sickness absence following ownership conversions in Norwegian kindergartens

Clicks: 17
ID: 337584
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #39 of 48 articles by views in journal of public administration research and theory

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The expansion of mixed-provider welfare systems has intensified debates about the consequences of public, nonprofit, and for-profit provision. Existing research focuses primarily on efficiency, service quality, and citizens' outcomes, while less is known about ownership conversions’ consequences for employees. We depart from research suggesting that ownership conversions can disrupt employee-organization value congruence as well as change the incentive structures. Leveraging population-wide administrative data from Norwegian childcare services (2015-2019), we examine whether ownership conversions are associated with changes in employee sickness absence. Using a staggered difference-in-differences design, we find that sickness absence increases following nonprofit-to-for-profit conversions. At the same time, public-to-for-profit transitions show little consistent relationship with sickness absence. These findings suggest that employee responses to ownership change are shaped less by the public-private divide than by differences in organizational missions and values. More broadly, the study highlights organizational value congruence as a potential mechanism linking ownership arrangements to employee well-being, and suggests that the nonprofit-for-profit boundary may be more consequential for employees than the conventional public-private divide.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223064619 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Håvard Thorsen Rydland, Dag Arne Christensen
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal journal of public administration research and theory
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jopart/muag036
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muag036
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.