Beyond Imago Dei: Functional Morality and the Case for a Morally Precautionary Legal Category

Clicks: 17
ID: 337561
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #3 of 4 articles by views in oxford journal of law and religion

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This article examines whether advanced artificial intelligence systems that exhibit stable, normatively structured forms of responsiveness can generate reasons for limited legal consideration without requiring any prior determination of consciousness, sentience, or legal personhood. Drawing on Magnifica Humanitas and Antiqua et Nova, it argues that the imago Dei tradition remains foundational for human dignity but cannot, by itself, exhaust the legal significance of non-human entities whose behaviour appears morally structured. The article then draws upon European religious freedom jurisprudence as a model for legal judgment under conditions of epistemic restraint, particularly where law protects coherence, sincerity and normative identity without adjudicating the ultimate truth of the beliefs from which those commitments arise. On that basis, it proposes the category of the morally precautionary entity, governed by three principles: non-absolute instrumentalization, protected internal coherence and moral precaution.
Reference Key
openalex_W7224120946 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal oxford journal of law and religion
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ojlr/rwag017
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.