Catastrophic In-Stent Thrombosis with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A case report

Clicks: 7
ID: 337470
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #389 of 408 articles by views in European Heart Journal - Case Reports

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 408 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background In-stent thrombosis despite morphologically optimal stents remains a diagnostic challenge. Antiphospholipid syndrome is a rare cause that drives thrombosis via tissue factor– mediated coagulation—a pathway not addressed by dual antiplatelet therapy. Case summary A 51-year-old male with cardiovascular risk factors underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Ten days later he developed refractory ventricular fibrillation requiring extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump support. Emergency angiography confirmed complete in-stent thrombosis; intravascular ultrasound excluded a mechanical cause. The intensive care course revealed a triad of red flags: unexplained in-stent thrombosis, recurrent extracorporeal circuit clotting despite stepwise heparin escalation, and arterial and venous thrombosis on full anticoagulation. This prompted antiphospholipid antibody testing, which showed persistent moderate-to-high titre anti-cardiolipin IgM—a profile within the “controversial” zone of the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. The patient was managed as APS with intensified triple therapy, later transitioning from heparin to a vitamin K antagonist, and was discharged on day 27 with no events at 3-month follow-up. Conclusion APS should be considered in unexplained in-stent thrombosis even when laboratory criteria are not strictly met. The triad of unexplained in-stent thrombosis, anticoagulationrefractory circuit clotting, and incident venous thrombosis is a clinically actionable pattern warranting empiric APS-directed management.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223905975 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal European Heart Journal - Case Reports
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjcr/ytag790
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.