Plant Polyphenol-Polysaccharide Complexes for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Molecular Interactions, Nano-Delivery Design, and Translational Evidence

Clicks: 9
ID: 337358
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #45 of 50 articles by views in nutrition reviews

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
CONTEXT: Plant polyphenol-polysaccharide complexes (PPCs) combine polyphenol bioactivity with the protective, mucoadhesive, and microbiota-accessible properties of polysaccharides. However, the literature often groups chemically distinct polyphenols together, extrapolates structure-function relationships across nonequivalent carriers, and interprets concurrent microbiota or short-chain fatty acid changes as causal mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: This review critically evaluated how molecular interactions and measurable structural attributes of PPCs influence gastrointestinal stability, colon-oriented release, biological effects relevant to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and translational readiness. DATA SOURCES: Targeted searches of PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were completed through July 20, 2026. Peer-reviewed original studies and relevant reviews published in English were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: Evidence was classified as direct PPC evidence, PPC-relevant formulation evidence, or non-PPC mechanistic and engineering evidence. Information on carrier chemistry, payload, structural attributes, release behavior, biological outcomes, and translational considerations was extracted. DATA ANALYSIS: Quantitative findings were compared only when carrier chemistry, payload, test conditions, and outcomes were sufficiently aligned; heterogeneous data were not pooled. Non-covalent assembly and covalent conjugation can alter molecular organization, physicochemical stability, and release, but no universal relationship between degree of substitution and release is supported. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate, quercetin, and anthocyanins require compound-specific carrier selection. PPC and PPC-relevant interventions are associated with changes in NF-κB-related signaling, epithelial-barrier markers, microbiota composition, and individual short-chain fatty acids, whereas receptor- or microbiota-mediated causality remains largely unverified. Responsive platforms also differ in stability, release control, scale-up burden, and clinical readiness. CONCLUSIONS: PPC-based nano-delivery is a promising preclinical approach, but translation requires matched studies linking structure, properties, and release, mediator-level mechanistic validation, standardized characterization, reproducible manufacturing, formulation-specific safety assessment, and comparison with established IBD therapies.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223856446 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal nutrition reviews
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/nutrit/nuag153
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.