Fine-tuning ASR for corpus linguistics: Singapore English

Clicks: 11
ID: 337339
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #24 of 26 articles by views in digital scholarship in the humanities

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Automatic speech recognition (ASR) is increasingly used to build large spoken-language corpora, yet its role is often treated as a purely technical preprocessing step. This paper argues that ASR configuration, especially model fine-tuning, constitutes a form of corpus design that directly shapes what linguistic analyses such resources can support. Focusing on Singapore English, we fine-tune six OpenAI Whisper model sizes on conversational data from Part 3 of Singapore’s National Speech Corpus and evaluate sixteen ASR systems, including baseline Whisper models and two alternative architectures, using word and character error rates on two held-out test sets. The best-performing fine-tuned model is then used to generate YCSEP_v2, an updated version of the YouTube Corpus of Singapore English Podcasts (approximately 620 h of audio). Evaluation goes beyond aggregate accuracy to examine linguistically salient phenomena. We compare corpus-level frequencies of discourse particles and disfluency markers and analyse three morphosyntactic variables (third-person singular -s, past tense zero marking, and copula absence). Fine-tuning yields substantial gains in transcription accuracy while improving the recovery of interactional features and reducing normalization towards mainstream English morphosyntax. The resulting transcripts diverge in systematic ways, demonstrating that ASR choices influence not only transcript quality but also corpus-based generalizations about linguistic feature frequencies and distributions. These findings position ASR adaptation as a methodological decision central to reproducible digital humanities and corpus-based linguistic research.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223791490 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal digital scholarship in the humanities
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/llc/fqag142
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.