A Comparative Study of the Taj Mahal from the Mughal Period and the Forbidden City from the Ming and Qing Dynasties

Clicks: 7
ID: 336805
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #587 of 953 articles by views in Pakistan Social Sciences Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 953 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study aims to compare the Taj Mahal of the Mughal period with the Forbidden City of the Ming and Qing dynasties, conducting an in-depth analysis from the perspectives of architectural scale, construction philosophy, craftsmanship, and political symbolism. As a masterpiece of the Mughal dynasty, the Taj Mahal embodies the fusion of diverse cultures and exquisite craftsmanship, symbolizing the rulers' pursuit of love and power. In contrast, the Forbidden City serves as a symbol of feudal imperial authority in China, highlighting the monarch's power through strict spatial planning and symmetrical layout. This paper employs literature review, case study analysis, and comparative analysis to examine the architectural features and cultural implications of both structures, revealing the diversity and richness of architectural art within different historical contexts. It emphasizes the importance of cultural exchange and integration in historical development. Ultimately, the study provides new insights into understanding the relationship between Eastern and Western architecture at the social, political, and cultural levels.
Reference Key
imported_1793231130_6ae2891ad40c4 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Social Sciences Review
Year 2023
DOI
10.35484/pssr.2023(7-III)99
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.