A Comparative Analysis of Islamic vs Conventional Banks by Evaluating Efficiency, Credit Quality and Business Model

Clicks: 7
ID: 336684
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #520 of 953 articles by views in Pakistan Social Sciences Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 953 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study utilizes a comprehensive dataset of 62 Islamic banks and 218 conventional banks across 20 countries, having dual banking system, from 1995 to 2020 to examine differences in business models, efficiency, and credit quality between the two banking types. The study finds that IBs and CBs tend to behave differently during the sampled period in terms of efficiency, credit quality and business model. Islamic banks demonstrate superior performance than conventional banks possess better credit quality and possess more diversified business model. The better performance of Islamic banks is mainly due to their superior risk management practices as mandated by the Shariah rules. Risk and return sharing remained the key driver behind this behavior of Islamic banks. The conclusion suggests that IBs need to achieve critical mass to reduce their costs and they need to introduce more innovative instruments to deal with the changing business environment across different countries.
Reference Key
imported_1793231001_6ae28899deadd Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Lubna Maroof
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Pakistan Social Sciences Review
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/pssr.2025(9-I)72
URL
https://ojs.pssr.org.pk/journal/article/view/1200
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.