Implications of Multiple Dictionary Meanings of Adjectives on Reading Comprehension of ESL Learners: A Study Conducted at BS Level in Rahim Yar Khan

Clicks: 8
ID: 336683
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #202 of 953 articles by views in Pakistan Social Sciences Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 953 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study investigates how multiple dictionary meanings of English adjectives affect BS-level ESL learners’ reading of academic texts in Pakistan. In classes where English is used for study, students often attach a familiar everyday sense to an adjective even when the paragraph signals a different meaning, which weakens comprehension. The study examines how learners decide on adjective meanings while reading whether they rely on context, dictionaries, or both, and which approach supports clearer reading. A quantitative survey was conducted with 300 BS students from three institutes in Rahim Yar Khan. A 30-item Likert-scale questionnaire recorded reading habits, strategy order, adjective confusions, and confidence in understanding. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages). Results show that most students combine context clues with dictionary consultation, but the sequence matters. Learners who first read the sentence and paragraph and then confirm their guess in a learner’s dictionary report fewer wrong choices and less disruption to reading flow than those who start from dictionary entries. Confusion is greatest where everyday meanings clash with academic or technical uses and with stance-setting adjectives such as “negligible” effect or “robust” method. The study recommends training students to “infer from context, then verify in the dictionary,” using example lines and frequent adjective–noun collocations, so that they move beyond one-meaning-per-word habits toward more flexible, context-based understanding.
Reference Key
imported_1793231001_6ae288992cdb8 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zohaib Zahid
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Pakistan Social Sciences Review
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/pssr.2025(9-I)71
URL
https://ojs.pssr.org.pk/journal/article/view/1199
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.