Legitimacy of Child Under Qanun-E-Shahadat Order, 1984: A Legal Perspective

Clicks: 7
ID: 336653
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #503 of 953 articles by views in Pakistan Social Sciences Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 953 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The legitimacy of a child represents a profound legal and social quandary in Pakistan, governed by Article 128 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO), 1984, as well as Islamic jurisprudence, and it is of special importance as far as issues of paternity, inheritance, guardianship and social identity are concerned. However, inconsistencies inherent in these laws have engendered contradictions regarding paternity determination, inheritance rights and the integration of scientific evidence. The main objective of this research paper is to analyze and critique Article 128 and sheds light on the interpretation ambiguities within it and why the judiciary shies away from DNA testing when legitimacy cases occur. Through intensive case study review, it sheds light on the courts’ application of legitimacy, denial of paternity, based on both religious and legal bases. The bottom line is to stress the urgency of a valid test for determining legitimacy to do justice and deliver equity. Given socio-legal implications surrounding legitimacy—particularly in relation to inheritance, guardianship and identity—it argues persuasively for reform in evidence laws to harmonize Islamic principles, judicial reasoning and advancements in science. The research methodology is doctrinal and includes analysis of comparative case law analysis, judicial interpretation, and application of forensic evidence in legitimacy determinations. The research resulted that though Islamic jurisprudence emphasizes Iqrar and marital legitimacy, the dynamic nature of legal systems requires more definitive positions on scientific evidence. In the end, this study recommends legislative amendments to clarify Article 128, judicial acceptance of DNA testing and public awareness initiatives to ensure that the legitimacy determination process is transparent and just; however, challenges remain.
Reference Key
imported_1793230975_6ae2887f7266d Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Social Sciences Review
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/pssr.2025(9-I)40
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.