Successes and Failure of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in Reducing Iran’s Nuclear Proliferation: An Analysis

Clicks: 8
ID: 336450
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #86 of 953 articles by views in Pakistan Social Sciences Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 953 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to elucidate the role of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in reducing Iran’s Nuclear Program. The JCPOA was an agreement between the EU, Russia, China and P5+1, as well as Iran. This research discusses its successes and failures. The JCPOA allowed Iran and the United States to restore diplomatic connections and begin talks on ending their nuclear arms development. Even so, Iran violated the terms of the deal in 2018 and retaliated by growing its nuclear program, reducing IAEA inspectors’ authority and letting more uranium become enriched. The efforts of the US backed by the JCPOA have been slowed because of international tension and higher support for Iran to develop nuclear arms. This qualitative study elaborates the different actions taken to minimize the conflict. The study recommends that the U.S. and Iran resume their participation in the JCPOA, making new commitments to sustain the agreement’s stability into the future.
Reference Key
imported_1793230787_6ae287c3c4f83 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Social Sciences Review
Year 2025
DOI
10.35484/pssr.2025(9-III)04
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.