Exploring Generalizations: A Doctrinal Analysis of Meanings, Kinds, and its Function in the Judicial Process of Proof

Clicks: 7
ID: 336429
2022
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,044 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The present study aims at analyzing the definitions, kinds, and functions of generalizations in the judicial process of proof. This is a multi-stage and fact-oriented process in which specific laws are applied on established facts. These facts are established with evidence produced by the parties which is subsequently evaluated by judges. Generalization plays significant role in the evaluation of evidence which necessitates its thorough understanding. Though a few researchers have examined generalization in legal context, however, there exists ambiguity regarding its definition, kinds and functions. The present study, which is doctrinal in nature, intends to fill this gap. The present study argues that generalizations are general statements about how things generally happen in the world. Additionally, it argues that generalization has various types according to their nature, purpose, source, and probative value. Similarly, this research has identified six various roles which generalization discharges in the judicial process of proof.
Reference Key
imported_1793230769_6ae287b191376 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Momina Khayal
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2022
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2022(6-II)48
URL
https://ojs.plhr.org.pk/journal/article/view/83
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.