Measurement of Creativity Index at Tween Level

Clicks: 8
ID: 336415
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #369 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The understanding of measuring the creativity of the students has always been neglected and the educated personals are not well aware how to measure the creativity. Educated personals failed to estimate creativity and also mythological understanding of creativity measurement. This study is an attempt to measure the creativity index of individuals at tween level. The objectives of the study were as; i) to accomplish an analytical mode of research in the area of fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration and ii) to estimate the extent of novelty between boys and girls. Research questions were frame keeping in view the objectives using exploratory research approach in quantitative context. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, research instrument (test) was constructed to measure the creativity of tweens. The response value of answers was established after the Wallach and Kogan’s creativity assessment model. The Wah Cantt consisted on 46 schools, was selected as the population of the study. Total sample size was 900 students including 464 boys and 436 girls. The data were interpreted by using Percentage and Principal Component Analysis. The Principal component analysis differentiated the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) significance. KMO test is to measure the how much data appropriate for the factor analysis. it is recommended that the promotional activities should be applied rather than formal and classical approach to further minimize the subject oriented discriminations, the creativity testing, intelligence testing and aptitude testing mode should be included in the entire evaluation system at tween level
Reference Key
imported_1793230758_6ae287a62e1c8 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2022
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2022(6-II)34
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.