Great-Power Politics and Institutional Constraints in UN Conflict Management: A Comparative Realist Analysis of Post-2000 Interventions in Kashmir, Palestine, Ukraine, Yemen, and Venezuela

Clicks: 7
ID: 336341
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #378 of 953 articles by views in Pakistan Social Sciences Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 953 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper discusses institutional barriers that constrain the effectiveness of the United Nations in major conflict zones since the year 2000. UN has been constructed to ensure international peace and justice but inequalities in the makeup of the Security Council are still there to influence decision making. The latest conflicts reveal the interference of geopolitical interests. The study represents a qualitative analysis that uses the Classical and Structural Realist theory by analyzing protracted conflicts, including Kashmir, Palestine, Ukraine, Yemen, and Venezuela, with the complement of institutional and policy document analysis. Results indicate that veto politics often culminates in institutional stasis that prevents the UN to take decisive actions even when there are increasing humanitarian crises. Consent and slows down the resolution of conflict is curtailed by strategic rivalry among the great powers. The research proposes limited vetoes during humanitarian emergencies, more representation of third word states, greater regional co-operation.
Reference Key
imported_1793230694_6ae28766ce89b Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Social Sciences Review
Year 2026
DOI
10.35484/pssr.2026(10-I)18
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.