Feminist Dystopia and Indigenous Models of Subjection: A Feminist Critique of Hanif Mohammad’s Red Birds

Clicks: 8
ID: 336149
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #339 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper explores the indigenous women’s portrayal as agency and subjection by attempting to determine the extent to which these women become representations of third world women in comparison to white women in the context of the new Orientalist theory in the postcolonial literary discourses. The selected text, Red Birds Hanif Mohammad, has been read under the lens of orientalism and new orientalism particularly relevant to the portrayal of Lady Flower Body, Mother Dear and Cathy. Red Birds though runs on the theme of the war on terrorism and its devastations in its narrative but while doing so, it projects multiple levels of identities of women of the west as well as the third world women who constantly experience agency as well as subjection. The study reveals that the third World women are experiencing feminist dystopia because white women have failed in sharing the fruits of the feminist movement.
Reference Key
imported_1793230519_6ae286b7950a2 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2022
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2022(6-IV)33
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.