Pedagogical Choices of Special and Inclusive Education Teachers Teaching at Public Schools of Punjab: A Comparative Study

Clicks: 7
ID: 336108
2023
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #888 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
A teacher has versatility in his/her teaching methodologies to create a positive learning environment. Teaching methods highly depend upon the nature of the topic, content, grade level, and needs of students. The present study divulges a comparison between Special Education Teachers (SETs) and Inclusive Education Teachers (IETs) in making appropriate teaching pedagogical choices to clarify the learning concepts of special children in special education and inclusive education classrooms. The sample of the study consisted of 500 inclusive education teachers and 500 special education teachers. The study revealed that there was a significant difference in the pedagogical choices of SETs and IETs based on their gender, locality, education, and experience. The majority of the SETs used the demonstration method, drill method, task analysis method, and activity method, whereas IETs used the lecture method as their preferred teaching method. The study revealed that SETs chose need-based teaching methodologies which were more appropriate to clarify the concept and meet the learners’ needs.
Reference Key
imported_1793230480_6ae28690b1dc9 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sajjad Ahmad
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2023
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2023(7-II)73
URL
https://ojs.plhr.org.pk/journal/article/view/573
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.