Exploring Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Writing: A Corpus-Based Research on Doctoral Dissertations

Clicks: 9
ID: 336075
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #338 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
It was a corpus-based research and aimed to explore disciplinary variations (in the use of phrasal features) in academic writing (AW) produced by L2 writers of English across disciplines. Corpus of this research (comprising 80 dissertations written by Pakistani doctoral level candidates from two academic disciplines i.e. Arts and Humanities and Life Sciences) was analyzed through AntConc after tagging through POS and MAT Taggers. The results revealed Pakistani AW (across academic disciplines) containing nouns more than any other phrasal feature. In addition, results also revealed the order of the highest and lowest frequencies to be similar both inter-, and intra-disciplines. It meant that Pakistani AW contained phrasal features. However, due to the frequent use of same features (i.e. nouns) in all of the eight sub-disciplines of Arts and Humanities and Life Sciences, disciplinary variation (except some inter- and intra-disciplinary variations in the frequencies of the use of the said features) was not significantly observed in Pakistani AW. On the basis of these results, it was concluded that Pakistani AW did not reflect significant disciplinary variation (a characteristic feature of L1 and L2 AW) in the use of phrasal features.
Reference Key
imported_1793230453_6ae28675db952 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2022
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2022(6-IV)06
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.