Sentiment Analysis of YouTube Comments on the Movie 'Zindagi Tamasha': Evaluating Public Perception and Social Impact Post-Ban

Clicks: 6
ID: 335786
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,101 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper aims to evaluate public opinion and understand the social consequences in the digital sphere after banning the movie "Zindagi Tamsha” (Circus of Life). It is a sad story of a character named “Rahat Khawaja”, a practising Muslim who accidentally faces ridicule because of a viral video in which he dances at a wedding reception. The study utilizes quantitative and qualitative methodology, employing computational linguistic tools and psychoanalysis to analyze sentiments conveyed in the comments on YouTube. The feelings represented in the comments are quantitatively classified into three categories: positive, neutral, and negative. The breakdown indicates that out of 3,885 comments, 1,921 are categorized as positive, 1,737 as neutral, and 227 as negative. According to qualitative analysis, banning the movie has emerged as a significant subject of disagreement, eliciting diverse opinions encompassing endorsement and censure. Policymakers and cinema regulators should promote discourse and interaction to address and reduce sociopolitical tensions indicated by this study.
Reference Key
imported_1793230062_6ae284eed5944 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2024
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2024(8-II)29
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.