The Floating of Maxims in PTV World’s Program “Dialogue”: A Pragmatic Analysis

Clicks: 7
ID: 335754
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #657 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The study aims to identify the flouting of Gricean maxims in the conversations of speakers in PTV World’s program Dialogue. Pragmatics plays a vital role in analyzing speech acts, particularly how listeners interpret implied meanings beyond expressed words. According to Grice’s cooperative principle, a flout occurs when speakers deviate from conversational maxims (Thomas, 1997). Such deviations can reveal deeper conversational strategies and patterns. This observational study employs a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze the phenomenon of maxim flouting. Grice’s cooperative principle and its maxims were applied to an episode of Dialogue. The program’s discussions were carefully observed, and the text was analyzed through subtitles to identify instances of flouting. The analysis revealed frequent flouting of the maxims of quality and quantity, primarily due to explanations, excessive information, and topic shifts by both the anchor and guests. Despite these deviations, no significant detrimental effects on the conversation were noted. Strict adherence to Grice’s cooperative principle is recommended for clearer and more meaningful communication in spoken discourse.
Reference Key
imported_1793229993_6ae284a9634aa Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2024
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2024(8-I)51
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.