Analysing Intra-lingual and Inter-lingual Errors in ESL Learners’ Essays at the University Level

Clicks: 7
ID: 335519
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #515 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The present study aims to analyse intra-lingual and inter-lingual types of errors, their causes and accessible solutions to the writing deficiency that majority of ESL learners face at the university level, and they fail to get satisfactory results in language learning. For investigation of this problem, a mixed-method approach, an explanatory sequential design was used. For data collection two instruments were used i.e., essay writing and semi-structured interviews. The data analysis was done by applying the Gas and Selinker (2008) error analysis model. Moreover, for intra-lingual errors, James’ (2013) error analysis taxonomy, and for the inter-lingual types of errors, the inter-lingual error taxonomy, suggested by Riri, Haryanto, and Salija (2018) was followed. The results demonstrate that the highest percentage of errors was found in intra-lingual and the lowest percentage of inter-lingual errors. Furthermore, the results indicated that the highest percentage in intra-lingual types of errors was overgeneralization followed by overlooking co-occurrence restrictions, exploiting redundancy, incomplete rule application, misanalysis, and hypercorrection respectively. Whereas, in inter-lingual errors, the highest percentage was overproduction, followed by misinterpretation, underproduction, calques, and substitutions. This present research is very significant for language teachers in finding minimize errors made by ESL learners in their essays at the university level.
Reference Key
imported_1793229777_6ae283d1ce043 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2024
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2024(8-IV)22
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.