Power and Language in a Time of Conflict: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Indian and Pakistani Political and Military Rhetoric during Bilateral Tensions

Clicks: 7
ID: 335437
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #467 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study investigates the role of language as both a tool of soft power and an ideological framework in the context of escalating bilateral tensions between India and Pakistan. It Explores how official statements by political and military leaders construct national narratives, legitimize state actions, and mobilize public sentiments. Employing a qualitative methodology, the study draws upon data collected from official press briefings delivered by political and military representatives of both nations. The analysis is conducted through the application of Norman Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of discourse. The analysis reveals that language is carefully crafted through metaphors, euphemisms, and symbolic allusions to justify military and political actions and enhance moral authority. Pakistani discourse frequently invokes Quranic symbolism and moral dichotomies to frame its stance as sacred defense, while India rhetoric emphasizes professionalism and rationality to project credibility. At the discursive level, official pronouncements and media outlets mutually reinforce one another, amplifying nationalist sentiments through intertextual connections, synchronized hashtags, and visual story telling. At the level of social practice, findings highlight entrenched ideological frameworks that normalize militarization, construct binary oppositions of “us” versus “them” and suppress avenues for dialogue or peacebuilding. Key findings further indicate that political dialogue is increasingly infused with military terminology, religious and mythical imagery, and exclusionary communicative tactics that frame the opponent as chaotic and threatening. Notably, during the May 2025 crisis, neither side referenced peace negotiations or collective conflict resolution. Overall, the study demonstrates how language functions as a strategic instrument for shaping national identity, rationalizing state action, and sustaining cycles of antagonism, while also offering potential openings for diplomatic rearticulation.
Reference Key
imported_1793229701_6ae283853fdf2 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Waqasia Naeem
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2025
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2025(9-III)25
URL
https://ojs.plhr.org.pk/journal/article/view/1258
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.