Lexical Analysis of “Domestic Violence Act” of United Kingdom and Pakistan: A Comparative Study

Clicks: 7
ID: 335414
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #450 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study is presented to lexically analyze the "Domestic Violence Act" of the United Kingdom (2021) and Pakistan (2020). This comparative study provides similarities, differences, and the portrayal of social actors within the legal framework. The social actors of “Domestic Violence Act” of Pakistan (2020) are analyzed with the help of Social Actor Representation by Van Leeuwan (2008). Qualitative methodology is employed in this study, data from the Acts are examined to discern lexical and predominant features. The study highlights the significance of linguistic analysis in legal discourse, shedding light on societal dynamics shaping domestic violence legislation. This study contributes to forensic linguistics, informing legal professionals, advocacy groups, and policymakers for enhanced legislation and effective implementation in addressing domestic violence. Findings suggest both Acts prioritize victim protection and justice, with divergent gender-inclusive strategies. While the United Kingdom’s Act (2021) adopts a non-gendered approach, Pakistan's Act (2020) explicitly addresses women's vulnerability. Despite efforts for inclusivity, challenges in implementation persist, particularly in patriarchal contexts, impacting justice delivery.
Reference Key
imported_1793229674_6ae2836a6a540 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2025
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2025(9-II)33
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.