Forensic Critical Analysis of Imran Khan’s 2017-18 Defamation Case: A Critical Discourse Approach Using Fairclough’s Model"

Clicks: 6
ID: 335304
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,086 of 1,121 articles by views in Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study investigates the linguistic features, power relations and ideology in defamation case filed against Imran Khan by Mir Shakeel-ur-Rehman in 2017-2018. It specifically explores linguistic characteristics, power dynamics, and ideological constructs in media–politics conflicts in Pakistan. Language has been a key point of legal and political struggle, in which discourse does not merely convey claims, but also establishes a power dynamic, ideological location, and institutional authority. Although research on political and legal discourse has increased globally, there is a notable gap of forensic linguistic studies focusing on defamation cases involving media–politics conflicts in Pakistan. The study uses Fairclough’s three dimensional model, forensic linguistics and critical discourse. A mixed-method approach based on qualitative critical discourse analysis and quantitative frequency analysis of legal lexicons was adopted. The data consisted of the court issued notice titled “Legal notice for defamation under section 8 of defamation ordinance, 2002” and selected transcripts of Imran Khan’s media briefings. Qualitative findings reveal that the legal notice contains formal dictative language to legitimize institutional authority and judicial power. Khan’s counter narrative constructs him as a subjected political actor suffering from media and judicial winds of politics. Quantitative results demonstrate a high frequency of abstract legal nouns and evaluating terms reflecting ideological positioning and judicial power. The study recommends further forensic linguistic studies on political and legal discourse in Pakistan. It also highlights the importance of critical discourse analysis in understanding institutional dominance and contesting authority.
Reference Key
imported_1793229572_6ae28304b5418 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Alia Kalwar
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review
Year 2026
DOI
10.47205/plhr.2026(10-II)11
URL
https://ojs.plhr.org.pk/journal/article/view/1399
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.