Logical Fallacies in Tweets: A Case of Pakistani Political Discourse

Clicks: 7
ID: 335215
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,012 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This qualitative descriptive work anticipates inspiring the users of social media to apply their critical thinking abilities to fairly assess the merits and defects of opinions. The researchers aim to inspire the user of social media to use responsible approach against their debates by pointing out and identifying the fallacies by its type to educate them. Researchers will point out diversity of fallacies with the help of examples. The findings of this study consequently have pedagogical implementations for practical uses to recognize logical fallacies in daily life. The research concludes that current political discussions are merely deceptive. They engage in emotional demagoguery, aggressive language, and personal attacks that have no place in a democracy. A reasonable, humble, and independent climate is needed to be re-established into the political sphere, and most importantly, citizens need to be made aware of these fallacies.
Reference Key
imported_1793229351_6ae28227302a4 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2022
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2022(3-II)52
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.