Exploring the Efficacy of Plain English to Measure Legal Aspirants’ Comprehension of Judicial Judgments

Clicks: 9
ID: 335123
2022
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #460 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study attempts to measure the linguistic adequacy of law students with reference to comprehension of judicial judgments and consumption of time. Data is collected in the form of test from the law students. Two tests are constructed comprising of five statements concerned with civil judicial judgments. Test 1 was carrying the original chunks of civil judicial judgments and test 2 was carrying the same test in plain version. Starting and ending of Timings were also essential to mention on the test. Tests were given to the 250 law students of five prestigious universities of Pakistan. The findings of the study revealed that the law students take less time while reading the plain legal language and raised the comprehensibility of judicial judgments.
Reference Key
imported_1793229213_6ae2819d312a4 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Iram Rubab, Ifra Batool, Yaghsha Sahar
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2022
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2022(3-I)03
URL
https://ojs.ahss.org.pk/journal/article/view/13
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.