Relationship between Principal’s Compromising, Competing and avoiding Conflict Management Styles with Academic Achievement

Clicks: 7
ID: 335026
2023
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #919 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This research study investigated the relationship between college principals' conflict management styles and students' academic achievement. The study used a correlational research method and surveyed public degree colleges in Punjab, Pakistan. A multi-stage sampling technique was utilized to select the sample for the study. The results showed that principals' use of compromising and avoiding conflict management styles positively correlated with academic achievement. In contrast, the competing style was negatively correlated with academic achievement, except for a weak positive correlation reported by teachers. The study suggests that avoiding conflict is the most effective approach in educational settings, while competing is not favored by most principals. The study recommends training principals and teachers in effective conflict management and exploring underlying factors influencing conflict management styles through qualitative research. The findings highlight the importance of conflict management in academic achievement and provide insights for educational leaders and policymakers.
Reference Key
imported_1793228985_6ae280b95f149 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ruqaya Naseem
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2023
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2023(4-III)83
URL
https://ojs.ahss.org.pk/journal/article/view/768
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.