A Comparative Study of High and Low Achievers and their Learning Styles at University Level’

Clicks: 7
ID: 334984
2023
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #896 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the comparing between high and low achievers and theirs’ learning styles at university level and to find out different learning styles used by the students’ at university level and compare mean score high and low achievers to use different learning styles at university level. This current work was also focus on the students learning styles at university level which make them high and low achievers. The study was delimited to the perception of students for gain education by using different learning styles. Achievement of the students are depend on theirs’ prefer learning styles. And the teachers facilitate the students for achieving the new facts and figures. It included formal experiences. The researcher collected personally from students. The population of the study was G.C University Faisalabad. The result and conclusions was draw on the basis of data-Analysis questionnaire contain nine factors of the learning styles and 350 items. The research supervisor and other professors of faculty were consulted for the development and validation of questionnaire. The researcher visited all the sample departments personally. The questionnaire was distributed among respondents and gave them maximum time to fill in the questionnaire. After collection of data, it was tabulated, scored analyzed and interpreted by means of suitable statically by applying descriptive statics and t-test. Secondary information were also collected in this regard and compared to assess the probability and significant of the study.
Reference Key
imported_1793228885_6ae28055a84db Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Asma Ishtiaq, Shumaila Mahboob, Shafqat Rasool
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2023
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2023(4-III)41
URL
https://ojs.ahss.org.pk/journal/article/view/478
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.