Evolution of Modern Insanity Defense: A Critical Review

Clicks: 7
ID: 334840
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #825 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The defense of insanity, which is an excuse defense against the criminal liability of a person, went through different phases of evolution before coming to its modern form. During different phases of history, the insanity, and the insanity defense were interpreted differently. The objective of this study is to review the evolution of the defense of insanity employing the doctrinal legal analysis approach. The findings of this review suggest that a critical phase in the evolution of the insanity defense started with the introduction of McNaughton rules. Moreover, different standards of insanity defense such as the Irresistible Impulse Rule, the New Hampshire Product Test, the Durham Rule, the ALI rule, etc. were also introduced. There is still a need for a better standard of insanity defense. The defense of insanity is still evolving and must be studied by adopting multidisciplinary approaches.
Reference Key
imported_1793228287_6ae27dff17045 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2023
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2023(4-IV)06
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.