A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Mechanisms in Pakistan and Germany: Challenges and Best Practices

Clicks: 12
ID: 334824
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #9 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This research provides a comparative analysis of intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement in Pakistan and Germany, identifying key challenges and best practices. As the global economy becomes more knowledge-driven, effective IPR protection is crucial. Pakistan faces significant challenges, including weak legal frameworks, low awareness among stakeholders, and limited resources for enforcement. In contrast, Germany’s system is more advanced but faces issues like digital piracy and adapting to new technologies. Using a comparative analysis of legal systems, enforcement agencies, and judicial practices, along with case studies and survey data, the study highlights Germany’s strengths in specialized IP courts and public awareness campaigns. Pakistan’s IPR protection remains limited in comparison. The study recommends Pakistan should adopt Germany’s specialized IP courts and awareness initiatives, while Germany should focus on addressing the challenges posed by digital piracy. Strengthening public-private partnership is emphasized as a key strategy for improving IPR enforcement in both countries.
Reference Key
imported_1793228254_6ae27dde4a412 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2024
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)57
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.