Chinese Facet: A Culturally Sensitive Account of Human Rights

Clicks: 7
ID: 334605
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #522 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper aims to accentuate Chinese attributes of human rights that are fairly unexplored both within and outside China. The paper uses qualitative methodology and endeavors to distinguish Chinese version of human rights from universal “one size fit all model” by tracing the basis of human rights in distinct Chinese history, and theoretical and ideological underpinnings of Marxism and Maoism. Moreover, as an exclusive contribution to the existing literature, this paper used 3 dimensions of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory to understand culture bound conception of human rights in China that is based primarily based on Confucianism. After having related Hofstede’s dimensions of Power Distance Index, Uncertainty Avoidance Index and Individualism vs Collectivism to human rights tradition of Confucianism in China, the relevance of these dimensions is traced in Modern Chinese constitution. The findings reveal that China has distinct genesis of human rights based on its cultural traditions and historical emergence which is distinct from western predominantly U.S dictated version of human rights based on notions of universalism, individuality, inalienability and indivisibility.
Reference Key
imported_1793227736_6ae27bd808758 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2024
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2024(5-III)59
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.