From Symbol to Strategist: Reassessing Fatima Jinnah’s Political Agency in the 1965 Presidential Election

Clicks: 7
ID: 334543
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #520 of 1,064 articles by views in Annals of Human and Social Sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,064 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study reassesses Fatima Jinnah’s political agency in the 1965 presidential election against Field Marshal Ayub Khan. Existing scholarship often remembers her as Madar-e-Millat and as Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s symbolic sister, while giving less attention to her strategic judgment, gendered resistance, and democratic opposition. The article applies a qualitative historical-analytical method, using election studies, feminist historiography, published primary materials, contemporary press reports, and secondary readings of the Fatima Jinnah Papers. The study finds that her candidacy involved calculated acceptance, constitutional rhetoric, national mobilization, careful handling of religious opposition, and principled resistance to an electoral system controlled by Basic Democracies. Future research should examine the Fatima Jinnah Papers directly, add Urdu and Bengali press evidence, compare her strategy with later women leaders, and move beyond commemorative biography toward evidence-based studies of Pakistani democratic opposition within South Asian civil-military conflict and gendered political memory debates more broadly.
Reference Key
imported_1793227585_6ae27b417680f Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Year 2024
DOI
10.35484/ahss.2024(5-IV)68
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.